Explore the site
Looking for a service, risk assessment or training course?
Use the Discovery System on the homepage to find the right option quickly.
Contact MHI
Looking for a service, risk assessment or training course?
Use the Discovery System on the homepage to find the right option quickly.
Fire and gas detection is one of those areas where “close enough” can become expensive — fast. If a detector is the wrong type, in the wrong place, or lacks coverage redundancy, you can end up with delayed detection, late isolation, escalation… and a whole lot of confusion when you need the system most.
At MHI Risk Engineers, we develop Fire & Gas Detection Layouts that are engineered for early hazard detection, reliable coverage, and practical uptime. We help you select the right detector technologies, optimise placement using advanced modelling, and design for maintainability — so the system performs in the real world, not just on paper.
A fire and gas detection layout answers four practical questions:
The output is typically a set of drawings and a design basis that defines detector placement, coverage philosophy, redundancy, and integration considerations.
Fire & Gas detection layout work is typically needed when:
Our Fire & Gas detection layout typically follow this approach:
We match detector technologies to the hazard scenarios and site conditions, including:
Selection depends on the hazard type, ventilation, congestion, release behaviour, and potential ignition pathways.
Where appropriate, we use advanced 3D modelling methods (for example using tools such as FLACS) to optimise detector placement based on:
This is especially useful for complex plants where “rules of thumb” don’t hold up well.
A good layout isn’t only about coverage — it’s about reliable coverage. We design for:
coverage reliability for both high-likelihood leak sources and high-consequence areas
Detection systems degrade when maintenance is unrealistic. We incorporate:
This turns the design into something you can operate and maintain long term.
Our layouts and design basis are aligned with recognised standards and good practice guidance, including:
Reach out for any inquiries, support, or to discuss how we can meet your industrial needs.
A fire and gas detection layout is the engineered plan that shows where detectors are placed, what type they are, and how the placement achieves coverage, redundancy, and early detection for credible fire and gas hazards. It usually includes drawings plus a design basis explaining the detection philosophy.
“F and G layout” (or F&G layout) is shorthand for the detector layout drawings and documentation that define fire detection and gas detection devices across a facility. It’s used to guide installation, commissioning, maintenance, and future upgrades.
At a high level:
In industrial environments, design must account for ventilation, congestion, ignition sources, and process hazards — not only building code logic.
These are commonly used categories (often referenced in building fire alarm contexts) describing how comprehensive the coverage is:
Industrial sites often combine building-code approaches with process hazard detection needs, which is why fire and gas mapping becomes critical.
“0.7 spacing rule” is typically referenced as a simplified spacing approach used in some fire detection layout practices (often tied to ensuring overlap or coverage effectiveness rather than relying on absolute maximum spacing). In real plants, spacing should be driven by:
So we treat spacing rules as a starting point — not the final answer.
A practical grouping of common gas detection approaches includes:
Your layout typically focuses on fixed detection (point/open-path) and how it integrates into alarms and shutdown logic.
F&G mapping is the process of mapping:
The purpose of fire and gas systems is to:
F&G stands for Fire & Gas.
Layer models differ by company, but a common “layered” approach includes:
Fire & gas detection sits in the critical early-warning layer.
Common types include:
The right choice depends on the environment (open air vs enclosed), expected fire type, and nuisance alarm risk.
“Part 6” usually refers to a specific standard or code section (often in national building/fire standards). The exact meaning depends on which code you’re working under. If your project references “Part 6,” we align the layout requirements to that standard while still ensuring the design meets industrial performance needs.
A fire and gas detection system is the combined set of:
Gas detector placement depends on:
A common mistake is placing detectors where they are easy to install, not where the gas will actually go.
Spacing depends heavily on:
In industrial contexts, detector spacing is often complemented by scenario thinking and coverage verification rather than relying on generic spacing alone.
If you need Fire & Gas Detection Layouts that are designed for coverage reliability, redundancy, and maintainability — and aligned to ISA TR84.00.07, NFPA 72, and IEC 61511 — MHI Risk Engineers can help you build a detection system you can trust when it matters most.
Effective fire and gas detection layouts should align with your broader hazard identification and compliance framework, including HAZOP studies and Fire and Explosion Risk Assessments (FERA). This ensures detector placement reflects real ignition scenarios, regulatory requirements and operational risk.